+44 7393 450837
advice@adamfayed.com
Seguir en

China’s Stock Market – Is This The World’s Worst Performing Stock Market?

As frequently readers know, I am sceptical about the media. I have previously criticised CNBC and Bloomberg in the US.

So, in this article, I will review three articles, at least two of which are misleading.

Firstly, today I read a piece from the South China Morning Post. I will put the article below, as well as link to it above, to show the issues with politicising the stock market and the media at large.

It also shows the big problem with conflating the virus and the stock market.

“China’s world-beating stock market has exceeded US$10 trillion in total capitalisation for the first time since the infamous rout in 2015, with the benchmark gauge topping all major global equity indexes as the government brought the coronavirus pandemic under control.

The combined values of shares trading on the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges reached US$10.04 trillion on Monday, according to Bloomberg data.

The market value briefly touched US$10.05 trillion in June 2015, the only other time it has reached the threshold, before a catastrophic meltdown erased half that value in the subsequent three months.

The ascent follows a back-to-back rally after the market resumed trading after the “golden week” holiday, with emphatic gains over the past two trading days. The surge has some merits this time, as the world’s second-largest economy became the first to lift the virus lockdown.

It is also the first so far to rebound from a contraction, as the US and Europe struggle with a resurgence of infections.https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/qaALr/1/This week’s trading could keep the US$10 trillion mark intact if the bulls keep up to the roaring start to the week. Much of the optimism is tied to President Xi Jinping’s planned visit to Shenzhen on Wednesday, with eyes on his policy address to mark the city’s 40th anniversary as a special economic zone.ADVERTISING

China’s market is now the world’s second-largest behind the US, which is capitalised at US$38.3 trillion. Japan and Hong Kong are ranked third and fourth, with market caps of US$6.2 trillion and US$5.9 trillion respectively.

China’s economy returned to growth in the second quarter with 3.2 per cent expansion, bouncing back from a 6.8 per cent decline in the previous three-month period. Gross domestic product likely expanded by 5.2 per cent last quarter, according to the market consensus. The GDP report is due on October 19.

While the listed companies still posted a decline in second-quarter earnings, the decrease significantly narrowed from that in the first three months and analysts estimated full-year growth would return to positive territory.

WHO members including China back investigation of UN body’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic

An uptick in economic and earnings growth coupled with a record amount of loans unleashed by commercial banks to spur growth has propelled stocks.

The run-up on Chinese stocks went through twists and turns. The Shanghai Composite slumped by as much as 13 per cent in March, almost dragging the gauge into bear territory as the market was ravaged by the outbreak of Covid-19, which was first reported in the central city of Wuhan.

The market recouped all the losses afterwards and tested a two-year high, as policymakers imposed strict lockdown measures and ramped up efforts to shore up growth.

Hong Kong stocks may remain volatile for months due to Covid-19 pandemic, says analyst Kenny Wen
Hong Kong stocks may remain volatile for months due to Covid-19 pandemic, says analyst Kenny Wen

04:36

Hong Kong stocks may remain volatile for months due to Covid-19 pandemic, says analyst Kenny Wen

Hong Kong stocks may remain volatile for months due to Covid-19 pandemic, says analyst Kenny Wen

The breakthrough in the market cap came after Chinese stocks were trading sideways over the past three months, with simmering tension between Beijing and Washington dampening sentiment. The momentum will strengthen if September economic data delivers evidence of continuing recovery, according to brokerages including New Times Securities.

Even after the post-holiday upsurge, the valuation is not too stretched. The Shanghai Composite is valued at 18.2 times earnings currently, compared with 25 before the market crash five years ago, Bloomberg data showed.

“The market will probably look forward to a new round of gains, should the coming data confirm the start of a new inventory cycle,” said Fan Jituo, an analyst at New Times Securities”

Analysis and problems with the article

Firstly, the South China Morning Post isn’t the only publication to mix up economic growth, virus’ and the stock market.

However, as I have mentioned on countless occasions, there is no connection between the two.

China’s Stock Market has fallen since 2006 (more on that later), yet the stock market has performed very badly.

That leads me onto the issue with this article. It claims that the Shanghai Stock Market has been “world beating”.

Firstly, that isn’t true. The Nasdaq has outperformed the Shanghai Stock Market.

Second, China’s Stock Market’s have been beaten down for so long, that they were due a rebound.

After hitting 6,000 in 2006, the market 2,600 in December 2018. The “surge” in the stock market to 3,300 is lower than the 5,000 mark it hit in 2015, and much lower than the 6,000 record set in 2006.

Whereas the Shanghai Composite is trading 50% below it’s 2006 peak, the S&P500 and Dow Jones are close to 300% higher, with the Nasdaq more than 500% higher!

With that being said, every dog has its day in investing. Emerging markets had a great run from 2000 until 2006.

They are due another great run. Chinese stocks do also look undervalued compared to US, and maybe even European, stocks.

With the markets 50% below its 2006 peak (and that isn’t even adjusted for inflation), having a 10% allocation to China is fine despite the risks compared to most developed markets.

It is just a huge mistake to conflate GDP, the response to the virus and stock market performance.

If that was the case, New Zealand, Australia, China and other countries with low rates of death would have beaten the US Stock Market this year.

That hasn’t happened as the Nasdaq in particular has shown. The graphs below show the long-term trend in the last 15 years:

a1 33

So perhaps the question should be different. Is the Chinese Stock Market the world’s worst long-term investment in the last 15 years?

Don’t fear the next stock market crash! It could be your chance to retire rich – The Motley Fool

A lot of investors have been worrying about the next stock market crash, ever since the last one. Many will have been deterred from buying UK shares as a result, fearing their value will plunge shortly afterwards.

By holding back, they missed the dramatic 1,000-point resurgence in the FTSE 100, a rise of 20% that leaves it trading at around 6,000 today. That’s the danger of waiting for the perfect time to invest in UK shares.

You simply don’t know what’s going to happen next. Nobody predicted the last market crash, and they won’t call the next one correctly too.

That’s right, there’ll be a next one. There always is, because that’s what stock markets do. They crash. Regularly.

Buy UK shares when they are down

According to Wikipedia, we’ve been through 14 global stock market crashes since the turn of the millennium, although you won’t recall most of them. The ones you will remember are the dotcom bubble in 2000, the financial crisis of 2007/08 and, of course, the Covid crash in February/March this year.

What did those three stock market crashes have in common? They hurt at the time, but markets recovered after a while. Investors who bought UK shares when markets were down cashed in when they bounced back. This will have boosted their chances of building a sufficiently large pot of money to get rich and retire early, which is what investing is all about.

We now find ourselves in an in-between world. Share prices have been idling for several months. Investors are watching and waiting to see where they go next. 

By rights, stock markets should be crashing. The second wave of the coronavirus is upon us. The UK isn’t the only country desperately trying to strike a balance between saving the economy and saving lives. Some major industries, such as travel and cinema, have been almost destroyed.

Share prices are now underpinned by stimulus totalling trillions of dollars. Politicians are scared to let stock markets crash, for all the wider damage that will cause. That’s something to bear in mind if you’re worried about investing at today’s prices.

Forget the stock market crash and buy shares

I wouldn’t recommend holding back from investing today in the hope of taking advantage of a stock market crash tomorrow. The market could rise instead, making shares more expensive rather than cheaper. If that happened, you might look back on today as a missed opportunity.

So when is the very best time to buy shares? The answer is simple. Whenever you have a bit of money to spare. The stock market will make it work harder than almost any other asset class, even if it does crash from time to time. Better still, you can take your returns free of tax inside a Stocks and Shares ISA.

So don’t worry too much about the next stock market crash. If it happens, do what you should always be doing. Buy shares to boost your chances of retiring rich.

Analysis of article

Nobody can time the stock market, and I have yet to meet a person that can forecast the future.

This article is right about that, and also that a stock market crash is a great opportunity to buy low.

I have yet to meet a person that has regretted buying during the “lost decade” from 2000 until 2010, or during the crash in March.

It is important not to take the wrong lessons from these kinds of articles though.

It would be tempting to keep money in cash, eagerly anticipating the next crash.

The reality is, March once again showed the benefits of having money in cash and bonds.

Short-term government bonds outperformed all other assets during the worst of the crisis.

That included commodities, gold and long-term government bonds. That gave the patient long-term investor the opportunity to rebalance towards cheaper stock market prices.

The bottom line is that the stock market has been the world’s greatest engine of wealth – even more so than property.

People get into problems when they try to be too clever. If you invest every month, or at least regularly, into the markets over decades, you will do fine.

Biden will win according to polls – Market Watch

With three weeks to go, President Trump’s re-election bid is in trouble. At least that’s what the polls show. 

But it’s not what the stock market is signaling. Based on nearly a century’s worth of election-year data, Trump may yet win.

Here’s the research, and it is compelling: Since 1928, whenever the S&P 500 Index SPX, -0.63%  of the largest U.S. stocks has risen in the three months prior to a presidential election, the party that controlled the White House won 90% of the time. 

“If you think about it intuitively, it makes sense,” says Julian Emanuel, chief equity and derivative strategist for the investment firm BTIG who compiled the data. “Because a rising stock market tends to be a ratification of the present policies being satisfying to the investing public.”

History lines up squarely behind Emanuel. In 1928, for example, President Calvin Coolidge, a Republican, chose to retire, but stocks rose between August and November. It was the last full year of the Roaring ’20s and helped lift the new GOP standard bearer, Herbert Hoover, into the White House. 

Four years later, the reverse occurred. The Great Depression, which began in the fall of 1929, dragged down stocks — including between August and November 1932 — and Hoover was crushed by Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt. 

In fact, there have been six presidential years since 1928 when the S&P 500 fell in the three months before election day. All six times, the party in the White House lost. 

In meting out its punishment, the markets have proven to be agnostic. In three of those six instances, Republicans lost. In the other three, Democrats did. In addition to 1932, Republicans also controlled the White House in 1960, but Vice President Richard Nixon fell short in his bid to replace President Dwight Eisenhower. In 2008, Republican George W. Bush was in the White House, but GOP nominee John McCain lost to Democrat Barack Obama. 

The three times that Democrats lost? Harry Truman chose to retire in 1952, but nominee Adlai Stevenson was crushed by Eisenhower. In 2000, Al Gore, the incumbent vice president, lost to Bush. And just four years ago, Donald Trump upended Hillary Clinton’s bid. 

Analysis

One of my favourite Warren Buffett’s quotes is “Stop trying to predict the direction of the stock market, the economy or elections”.

The last few years should have taught us all that. In 2016, most people thought Clinton would win.

Even more people thought the stock market would crash if Trump did win.

It didn’t. Those that tried to time the market, and delayed investing in 2015-2016 due to fear, once again missed out.

Regardless of what happens in the election, or indeed the stock market, just keep to a long-term plan.

Esta URL es meramente un sitio web y no una entidad regulada, por lo que no debe considerarse directamente relacionada con ninguna empresa (incluidas las reguladas) de la que pueda formar parte Adam Fayed.

Este sitio web no está dirigido a ninguna persona de ninguna jurisdicción -incluidos los Estados Unidos de América, el Reino Unido, los Emiratos Árabes Unidos y la RAE de Hong Kong- en la que (debido a la nacionalidad, residencia o cualquier otro motivo de dicha persona) esté prohibida la publicación o disponibilidad de este sitio web y/o sus contenidos, materiales e información disponible en este sitio web o a través de él (en conjunto, los “Materiales“), ni ninguna persona debería acceder a este sitio web.

Adam Fayed no garantiza que el contenido de este sitio web sea apropiado para su uso en todos los lugares, ni que los productos o servicios de los que se habla en este sitio web estén disponibles o sean apropiados para su venta o uso en todas las jurisdicciones o países, o por todo tipo de inversores. Es responsabilidad del usuario conocer y observar todas las leyes y reglamentos aplicables de cualquier jurisdicción pertinente.

El Sitio Web y el Material están destinados a proporcionar información únicamente a inversores profesionales y sofisticados que estén familiarizados y sean capaces de evaluar las ventajas y los riesgos asociados a los productos y servicios financieros del tipo descrito en el mismo, y ninguna otra persona debe acceder a ellos, actuar en consecuencia o basarse en ellos. Nada de lo contenido en este sitio web pretende constituir (i) asesoramiento en materia de inversión o cualquier forma de solicitud o recomendación, ni una oferta, o solicitud de oferta, de compra o venta de cualquier producto o servicio financiero, (ii) asesoramiento en materia de inversión, jurídico, empresarial o fiscal, ni una oferta para proporcionar dicho asesoramiento, ni (iii) una base para tomar cualquier decisión en materia de inversión. Los Materiales se facilitan únicamente con fines informativos y no tienen en cuenta las circunstancias individuales de ningún usuario.

Los servicios descritos en el sitio web están destinados exclusivamente a clientes que se hayan puesto en contacto con Adam Fayed por iniciativa propia y no como resultado de ninguna comercialización o solicitud directa o indirecta. Cualquier compromiso con los clientes se lleva a cabo estrictamente sobre una base de solicitud inversa, lo que significa que el cliente inició el contacto con Adam Fayed sin ninguna solicitud previa.

*Muchos de estos activos están siendo gestionados por entidades en las que Adam Fayed tiene participaciones personales, pero a las que no presta asesoramiento personal.

Este sitio web se mantiene con fines de marca personal y está destinado únicamente a compartir las opiniones personales, experiencias, así como la trayectoria personal y profesional de Adam Fayed.

Capacidad personal
Todos los puntos de vista, opiniones, afirmaciones, ideas o declaraciones expresadas en este sitio web son realizadas por Adam Fayed a título estrictamente personal. No representan, reflejan o implican ninguna posición oficial, opinión o respaldo de ninguna organización, empleador, cliente o institución con la que Adam Fayed esté o haya estado afiliado. Nada de lo contenido en este sitio web debe interpretarse como realizado en nombre o con autorización de ninguna de dichas entidades.

Avales, afiliaciones u ofertas de servicios
Algunas páginas de este sitio web pueden contener información general que le ayude a determinar si reúne los requisitos necesarios para contratar los servicios profesionales de Adam Fayed o de cualquier entidad en la que Adam Fayed trabaje, ocupe un cargo (como consejero, directivo, empleado o consultor), tenga una participación accionarial o financiera, o con la que Adam Fayed tenga algún otro tipo de relación profesional. No obstante, dichos servicios, ya sean ofrecidos por Adam Fayed a título profesional o por cualquier entidad afiliada, se prestarán de forma totalmente independiente a este sitio web y estarán sujetos a términos, condiciones y procesos de contratación formales distintos. Nada de lo contenido en este sitio web constituye una oferta de prestación de servicios profesionales, ni debe interpretarse como la formación de una relación de cliente de ningún tipo. Toda referencia a terceros, servicios o productos no implica aprobación ni asociación, a menos que se indique explícitamente.

*Muchos de estos activos están siendo gestionados por entidades en las que Adam Fayed tiene participaciones personales, pero a las que no presta asesoramiento personal.

Confirmo que no resido actualmente en Estados Unidos, Puerto Rico, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Irán, Cuba ni ningún país fuertemente sancionado.

Si vive en el Reino Unido, confirme que cumple una de las siguientes condiciones:

1. Grandes patrimonios

Hago esta declaración para poder recibir comunicaciones promocionales exentas

de la restricción de promoción de valores no realizables inmediatamente.

La exención se refiere a los inversores certificados de alto patrimonio neto y declaro que reúno los requisitos para serlo porque se me aplica al menos una de las siguientes condiciones:

He tenido, durante todo el ejercicio inmediatamente anterior a la fecha que figura a continuación, unos ingresos anuales

por valor de 100.000 libras esterlinas o más. Los ingresos anuales a estos efectos no incluyen el dinero

retiradas de mis ahorros para pensiones (excepto cuando las retiradas se utilicen directamente para

ingresos en la jubilación).

Poseía, durante todo el ejercicio inmediatamente anterior a la fecha indicada a continuación, activos netos al

valor igual o superior a 250.000 libras esterlinas. A estos efectos, el patrimonio neto no incluye la propiedad que constituye mi residencia principal ni el dinero obtenido mediante un préstamo garantizado con dicha propiedad. Ni ningún derecho que me corresponda en virtud de un contrato o seguro admisible en el sentido de la Ley de Servicios y Mercados Financieros de 2000 (Actividades Reguladas) de 2001;

  1. c) o Cualesquiera prestaciones (en forma de pensiones o de otro tipo) que sean pagaderas sobre la

cese de mis funciones o en caso de fallecimiento o jubilación y a la que estoy (o mi

dependientes), o puede tener derecho a ello.

2. Inversor autocertificado

Declaro que soy un inversor sofisticado autocertificado a efectos de la

restricción a la promoción de valores no realizables inmediatamente. Entiendo que esta

significa:

i. Puedo recibir comunicaciones promocionales realizadas por una persona autorizada por

la Autoridad de Conducta Financiera que se refieren a la actividad de inversión en activos no listos para la venta.

valores realizables;

ii. Las inversiones a las que se refieran las promociones pueden exponerme a un importante

riesgo de perder todos los bienes invertidos.

Soy un inversor sofisticado autocertificado porque se da al menos una de las siguientes circunstancias:

a. Soy miembro de una red o sindicato de business angels y lo he sido durante

al menos los últimos seis meses anteriores a la fecha que figura a continuación;

b. He realizado más de una inversión en una empresa que no cotiza en bolsa en los dos años

antes de la fecha indicada a continuación;

c. Estoy trabajando, o he trabajado en los dos años anteriores a la fecha que figura a continuación, en un

profesional en el sector del capital privado, o en la provisión de financiación para

pequeñas y medianas empresas;

d. Actualmente soy, o he sido en los dos años anteriores a la fecha indicada a continuación, administrador de una empresa con un volumen de negocios anual de al menos 1 millón de libras esterlinas.

Adam Fayed no tiene su sede en el Reino Unido ni está autorizado por la FCA o la MiFID.

Adam Fayed utiliza cookies para mejorar su experiencia de navegación, ofrecer contenidos personalizados basados en sus preferencias y ayudarnos a comprender mejor cómo se utiliza nuestro sitio web. Al continuar navegando por adamfayed.com, acepta el uso que hacemos de las cookies.

Si no da su consentimiento, será redirigido fuera de este sitio, ya que dependemos de las cookies para la funcionalidad básica.

Más información en nuestro Política de privacidad.

SUSCRÍBETE A ADAM FAYED ÚNASE A INMENSA ABONADOS DE ALTO PODER ADQUISITIVO

SUSCRÍBETE A ADAM FAYED ÚNASE A INMENSA ABONADOS DE ALTO PODER ADQUISITIVO

Acceda gratuitamente a los dos libros de Adam sobre expatriación.

Acceda gratuitamente a los dos libros de Adam sobre expatriación.

Obtenga más estrategias cada semana sobre cómo ser más productivo con sus finanzas.