Woodville Litigation Funding Investment Review – Do Superior Alternatives Exist?

Woodville Litigation Funding investment review – that will be the topic of today’s article.

During this article I will speak about the positives and negatives associated with this investment and why, for most investors, superior risk-adjusted options exist.

This is particular important given the news in November 2025 that Woodville will be delaying repaying one of their bonds (more on that below).

If you have been proposed Woodville Litigation Funding and want a second opinion, you can email me (advice@adamfayed.com) or contact me here.

Woodville do not focus on UK-resident investors, so this revise should be considered by people living outside the UK only.

Introducción – who are Woodville and what are the basics associated with this investment?

Woodviile are a UK-based company who specialize in litigation funding. The main focus is in consumer finance and personal injury.

The company makes a return of the proceeds if a successful claim is made by somebody who qualifies for one of the loans.

Woodville offer a one, two and three year bonds. The returns are 10%, 11% and 12% respectively.

I have heard reports from clients that they were only being offered 8% on Woodville one year by another provider, but the official return is 10% per annum.

The investment is available in Euros, USD and British Pounds.

The investment minimums are $10,000, with most investors doing much higher sums.

They have over 1,500 active investors and have raised over 37 million Pounds. They aim to raise over 200m.

Thus far, 30,000 claims have been funded.

Where is the investment sold?

The investment is sold globally, but especially in expat hotspots such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and beyond.

Often it is part of a wider portfolio, sold on platforms such as Custodian Life and Capital Platforms.

How does Woodville manage the risk?

Woodville selects cases based on three criteria according to materials they have produced

• They enter at a late stage of the process when liability is established
• The lending to law firms is done after ATE insurance is put in place
• They are given assignment rights on each case.

With that being said, it has to be remembered that many other litigation funds have gone bankrupt. This doesn’t mean that the same thing will happen to Woodville.

It merely means that the above considerations don’t negate the fact that this is a high-risk, alternative asset, which should only be considered by certified high-net-worth individuals and sophisticated investors.

What are the positives associated with this investment?

• If you are holding Woodville as a small part of a diversified portfolio, then it might fit in with your strategy.
• Woodville say there is the security of having First Charge over the legal cases
• The insured option, which is only available on larger amounts of money, offers enhanced protections, although the insurance doesn’t cover everything (more on that below).
• 0% default rate so far, and an expanding company in an area (litigation) which is becoming a bigger market over time.
• The returns are net of fees and charges, so clients don’t have to calculate a complicated ROI
• The litigation market is growing and is currently worth hundreds of billions a year. There is a constant demand for this kind of work, even in economic downturns.
• Woodville are focused on the more liquid end of the market, with many of their loans maturing in 6-12 months. Many larger providers don’t give out these kinds of loans to law firms.
• Whilst some people might have a moral problem with funding lawsuits, there is an alternative narrative. Namely, the traditional legal system doesn’t work well for people without big pockets. It is too expensive and troublesome to take a case to court. What is more, if you lose, you usually have to pay the other side’s legal costs, which can be crippling. This kind of financing does address the balance, and give people new options to pursue.
• Before fixed-return and interest rates increased in 2023, it could be argued that this was a decent risk-adjusted return for those that invested in 2022 or before that.
• The Islamic bond is one of the few options in the market that targets alternative investments.

What are the negatives?

The main negatives are:

• You are locked in for 1-3 years.
• If you don’t go for the insured option, you are taking a much bigger risk than through A-rated corporate and government bonds. Even with the insured option, the insurance doesn’t cover everything.
• With an investment of this kind, there is always a risk of completely losing your capital. It has happened on many occasions with similar investments
• There are also many new options available in the expat and high-net-worth market such as A-rated banks offering close to 9% on certain products that we have offered to clients. Given that Woodville’s return is only 2%-3% per year higher, you have to question if the extra risk is worth it. To understand more about those alternatives you can contact me here.
• You are reliant on your investment advisor to construct a good, well-rounded portfolio, which meets your needs. This is the case with any investment though, and can be a positive or negative depending on who is representing you.
• Woodville is completely focused on the UK-market (meaning they are focused on lending to UK law firms not UK-based investors). This is good in some ways. It is a tried-and-tested market, and there isn’t the complexity of multi-jurisdictional lawsuits. It is also a stable market, because some people always take the litigation route. In fact, people are arguably more likely to seek litigation during troubling economic times. It does mean you are reliant on one economy though.
• Even if you want to take a bigger risk with alternative assets, there are other options available that pay higher returns for similar levels of risk. That includes some firms that have been in the loan note market for far longer than Woodville.
• Ultimately, private investments (private equity and private debt) are never as transparent as listed options available in the stock market. It is, therefore, almost impossible to fully assess the risk.
• After receiving private and confidential information in October 2023, my view become a little bit more negative about this investment.
• The FCAs recent decision on PCP might add some extra risks for models like this, but this isn’t yet fully known.
• What we do know is that Woodville have asked for a vote on delaying repaying one of their bonds until 2026. The delay is only for a few months, and investors will be compensated with higher returns. It also will only affect one of their bonds, and not the loan notes. It does show, however, the risks with their model. The delay was due to certain liquidity risks that could happen with the loan notes as well.

So, whilst considerable positives exist, the negatives outweigh them for most investors. This is especially the case now that fixed-income returns have gone up due to higher interest rates.

How does the insurance option work?

On investment amounts above a certain threshold, it is possible to add an insurance option, which we have done on many occasions.

If after two weeks of payment being due, Woodvile haven’t paid, the investor can first speak to Woodville.

If that doesn’t work, it is possible to speak to the insurer directly to make a claim, within 28 days.

However, it is a mistake to think that insured options are risk-free. There have been other insured options that have collapsed. Like all insurance, the terms and conditions don’t cover everything.

What are the challenging going forward for firms like this?

The more difficult economic conditions in 2023 and possibly 2024 could present opportunities and threats for firms like Woodville.

It could be argued that more difficult economic times will result in more people taking litigation action against others.

What is more, Woodville aren’t reliant on getting money from the banks, so higher interest rates shouldn’t affect the model.

With that being said, more difficult economic times always presents threats to any business model.

Conclusión

Higher returns in the fixed-return space in 2023 means that in the majority of cases better risk-adjusted returns are available in the market.

However, if kept as a small percentage of a larger portfolio, Woodville can sometimes offer a value-add.

This is especially the case if you are looking to diversify. The insured option also offers some value-added, even though it is a mistake to think that it is a risk-free option.

Given the massive risks but also opportunities in alternative assets, it is important to seek a second opinion, especially if you are not a financial expert.

If you are looking for a second opinion you can contact me directly.

¿Le duele la indecisión financiera? ¿Quiere invertir con Adam?

Adam es un autor reconocido internacionalmente en temas financieros, con más de 830 millones de respuestas en Quora, un libro muy vendido en Amazon y colaborador de Forbes.

Further Reading

On the article below, taken directly from my Quora.com answers, I speak about the FTX scandal and collapse, alongside numerous other topics.

https://adamfayed.com/why-did-ftx-collapse-what-does-ftxs-collapse-reveal-about-cryptocurrencies