I often write on Quora.com, where I am the most viewed writer on financial matters, with over 384.1 million views in recent years.
In the answers below I focused on the following topics and issues:
If you want me to answer any questions on Quora or YouTube, or you are looking to invest, don’t hesitate to contact me, email (advice@adamfayed.com) or use the WhatsApp function below.
Some of the links and videos referred to might only be available on the original answers.
Source for all answers – Adam Fayed’s Quora page.
In any 10 year period, the chances of the S@P500 going up are very high, especially if you adjust to dividend reinvestment.
Historically, there is over a 95% chance of the market being up over a ten-year period, especially adjusted for dividend reinvestment.
However, in the stock market there are two kinds of returns:
For example, in the 1962–1982 period, the ‘real’ investment fundamentals were slightly better than in 1982–2000.
Yet the returns were lower. Why? Well, the speculative return in the first time period was -4% per year, bringing down the total returns.
In comparison, from 1982–to 2000, the total returns were about 16% per year.
Did dividend and earnings explain this full 16%? No. About half the return was speculative.
So, let’s look at today’s market. The S@P500 is paying around 1%-2% in dividends, with markets like the FTSE paying 2%-3%.
Earnings growth is 6%-7% per year. If this follows through until the end of the year, the real (investment fundamental) growth of the stock market should be 7%-9% in most markets.
However, the speculative return could enhance those returns or be negative.
In the long term, the real investment returns do match the fundamentals.
That is to say that markets can be under and overvalued in the short or even medium-term.
Over 40–50 years, that usually changes. For example, from 1961–to 2000, the total return of most major stock markets was almost identical to the dividend and earnings growth.
Therefore, I would definitely expect the markets to rise in the next 25–30 years because dividends will be paid and (the best) firms in the index will become more profitable over time.
We live in a time of influencers, where some imply that it is easy to get rich fast. It isn’t. If it was, everybody would do it.
Making $1million after 10 years is much more difficult than 3million after 40 years, due to compounding and the fact you can’t rely on markets as much.
What do I mean by that? $10,000 invested in the S&P from 1941 until now would be worth $51million today, which is huge even adjusted for inflation, but the growth rate from 2000 until 2011 was 0%.
So longer-term, passive investing works and has always produced the goods over any long period of time.
In the medium-term (10 years in this case) all you can do is give yourself the best chance by:
Remember also that wealth is just income-expenditure x compound returns. Look at all three parts of the equation.
But, honestly, you need more luck over a ten-year time horizon versus thirty years.
I would, therefore, just focus on merely giving yourself a fighting chance of achieving what you want.
Even better, just put yourself in a good enough position in ten years to be doing well in 5–10 years after that.
I watched a very astute video a few days ago from the renounced YouTuber Graham Stephen.
He looked at five habits that have changed his life. As somebody who has spoken to people about their finances for so long, I can confirm that these habits make sense:
Habit 1 . Invest now/asap. As he says, those who delay once, tend to always delay.
They wait until that upcoming crash that they have been predicting for years, and when there is finally a decline, they wait for an even bigger decline.
Then they reach 30 or 40 and regret procrastinating.
Habit 2. Don’t market time. At the opposite end of the spectrum to the procrastinators are those who try to find the best time to get in, and out, of the market.
These tend to be active traders. We have seen a big increase in this due to the rise of DIY investment platforms.
As he says, the evidence shows most of these people either lose money or at least lose to the market.
There have been many times when the market has been up 10% per year and the average investor has struggled.
The reason
Habit 3. Understand your investments. If you aren’t a professional investor or don’t have an advisor to guide you, you really need to understand what you are getting into.
Habit 4. Don’t invest short-term. If you invest long-term, and you lose money, you have either:
5. Investing consistently. If you have a lump sum, it is better to put it in, rather than putting the money in as months’ injections (called dollar-cost averaging).
Dollar-cost averaging has only defeated lump-sum investing on 30%-34% of the occasions, depending on which time frame you look at, as per this analysis from the Personal Finance Club:
However, most of us have a salary or business income, and therefore we need to dollar cost average up to a point, as we can’t get ten years of income forwarded to us in advance.
Investing a lump sum + injecting new money further decreases risk.
The commonality? Key it simple and consistent. Once the basics have been achieved, then you can focus on more sophisticated ideas.
We all hear about the extremes, such as the former billionaires like Chuck Feeney, who went from having billions to just over $1m.
Or high-profile people like Simon Jordan, who didn’t go to “rags” but certainly lost a lot:
The media loves speaking about extremes. What we hear much less about, however, are less extreme cases.
Such as former multi-millionaires, or those who merely had high incomes (but low wealth) who ended up very poor.
Here are some examples from my network
None of these people went broke due to breaking the law or ill health, which are two leading causes of such cases.
All of these people could have been worth $5m-$10m + if they had have invested more, been careful about multiple marriages and/or watched their spending habits better, because good decisions compound.
And that is just in my network. Statistics show that up to 78% of former professional footballers go bust, with many lottery winners and inherited wealthy going the same way.
The commonality between the above people is that they put all their eggs into one basket, spent too much and/or did too little planning.
This is foolish because the good times don’t always last, and can end tomorrow due ill health or another reason.
Success can lead to complacency and complacency can be your downfall.
A healthy degree of paranoia helps.