I often write on Quora.com, where I am the most viewed writer on financial matters, with over 491.7 million views in recent years.
In the answers below I focused on the following topics and issues:
If you want me to answer any questions on Quora or YouTube, or you are looking to invest, don’t hesitate to contact me, email (advice@adamfayed.com) or use the WhatsApp function below.
Some of the links and videos referred to might only be available on the original answers.
Source for all answers – Adam Fayed’s Quora page.
Keeping it to ten is difficult but I will make a stab at it.
However, I would say one of the biggest mistakes people make is overthinking things in the first place, and asking too many questions.
As per this quote, most of life is about showing up:
It is better to get started today with 80% certainty than wait for 99%, as that never happens.
That is one reason people tend to “think about” investing for months, years and even decades!
Subsequently most regret not getting in sooner.
Some British expats living overseas will probably be amazed by my answer.
This is a potential tax trap, which I will deal with later in the answer.
Firstly, let’s focus on people living in the UK.
For people living in the UK it is quite simple. 40% on anything above £325,000. So, if your estate is worth £1,325,000, you pay tax on a million and not the 325,000.
Of course, there are things people can do to minimize it such as:
The devil is in the detail, and those details always change, so needless to say this isn’t formal tax-advice, and it does pay to get advice from a tax advisor and/or do your own research.
Yet the more striking aspect of inheritance tax is for those living overseas.
Many British people mistakenly think that just because they have changed their residency, tax residency or even citizenship, that this means they don’t need to pay the 40%.
Just because somebody lives overseas and has no UK tax ties and therefore doesn’t pay UK income taxes, doesn’t mean that inheritance taxes works in the same way.
Residency, tax residency and domicile work differently. Domicile is the hardest thing of all to change.
So, you could have not spent a day in the UK for fifty years but still pay 40% on assets above 325k, no matter where the assets are located globally.
No wonder UK inheritance tax receipts are hitting records. I doubt it is just because of higher levels of wealth:
In a post-Covid era, where governments need more tax money, the rules will probably get harsher.
The good thing is people living overseas have access to offshore trusts and other legal structures, which makes effective inheritance tax planning possible.
If we look at the graph above, the current CAPE ratios show that the UK, Japanese, European and especially emerging markets look cheap.
That has resulted in many people asking the same question that has been asked here.
Ultimately, there is no perfect way to predict markets. If there were, everybody could market time. I have yet to meet a person who has kept money in cash, hoping for a fall, to beat the stock market consistently.
Having said that, the CAPE ratio is as good a measure as any in terms of predicting the next decade or two for a given market.
It is certainly better than:
The markets have done well, and badly, under all of these conditions. They went up during the Cuban Missile Crisis, WW1 and the Spanish Flu pandemic and the recent Covid-19 episode.
So, the CAPE ratio is a better valuation measurement than most.
What is even better is this. Not comparing CAPE ratios by market, but comparing the CAPE ratio to its historical levels.
For example, comparing the Hong Kong market’s CAPE to its historical level, rather than to the S&P500 or FTSE100.
It is still an imperfect measurement. The Russian stock market looked cheap for a long time, but we now understand that buying it would have been a mistake.
We also have to factor in risk. Emerging markets are riskier than US stock markets.
Buying country-specific funds and ETFs is just a slightly easier way to beat the S&P500, compared to stock picking.
One reason is that few individuals or even institutions want to buy unfashionable investments which haven’t performed well for a long time (those firms with low CAPE ratios).
People prefer to buy emerging markets when everybody else is (the 2000s), and not when they have underperformed US markets for over a decade (now).
Likewise, everybody loved technology in the late 90s, but not in 2002.