I often write on Quora.com, where I am the most viewed writer on financial matters, with over 369.2 million views in recent years.
In the answers below I focused on the following topics and issues:
If you want me to answer any questions on Quora or YouTube, or you are looking to invest, don’t hesitate to contact me, email (advice@adamfayed.com) or use the WhatsApp function below.
Some of the links and videos referred to might only be available on the original answers.
Source for all answers – Adam Fayed’s Quora page.
Firstly, it is important to make a distinction between the signal and the noise.
If you want to retire early, you need to invest your money. It is almost impossible to save your way to retirement, never mind early retirement.
But what puts people off investing is when there is market volatility across many asset classes, such as the stock market.
This volatility comes with the territory though. It has always been there, and always will be.
It is important not to get distracted by short-term news, media reports, and declines in asset values.
Apart from that here are some other ideas
I would also be careful who you associate with. If you want to get fit it is better to spend time with others who have the same goal or have achieved what you hope to get.
The same is true for finance and early retirement.
Let’s look at history.
When Nazi Germany came into WW2, the S&P500 fell 25% in the next few weeks.
One year later the market had recovered most of the falls, despite the war continuing.
After Japan attacked Pearl Harbour, the US stock market fell by 11% in a single day. One year later the S&P500 was up 15%.
The Vietnam and gulf wars saw much smaller falls.
On average, the S&P 500 has been down 6.5% 3 months following the conflict, but around 13% positive a year after.
So, even over a one-year period, it has little effect. Over the medium to long-term, it has never had an impact.
As the chart below shows, the stock markets have gone up during most wars:
They also went up during 2014, despite the Ukraine-Russia situation.
That doesn’t mean they went up because of the wars. They likely went up in spite of wars.
Markets do tend to rise long-term, after all, so if a war goes on for a few years, markets are likely to rise.
That doesn’t mean there isn’t some volatility on hearing news about the start of a war.
I would also be careful in reading anything into the stock market falls of 2022. The FTSE in the UK hasn’t really fallen, in fact, it has often been up this year (even if it is 0.09% down at the time of writing).
10%-15% falls are normal and happened twice last year despite the stellar stock market performances we saw.
The biggest mistakes investors make is thinking too much about these things.
There will always be wars, pandemics, trade wars, government shutdowns, disputed elections, and new and unexpected events such as 9/11.
Each time the same pattern emerges. Markets either unexpectedly rise, or they do fall, but then recover.
Look at all the events that have happened in the last few years, including the unexpected stock market falls if there was a disputed US election in November 2020.
In fact, markets rose about 15% in that month, meaning investors who were afraid and in cash missed out.
This is why the news media is so profitable – there will always be new news to frighten people.
Various research has shown that trading based on the news isn’t as profitable as just buying and holding – in other words not caring about what is going on.
This is one reason why dead investors outperform the living – they don’t have emotions and therefore ignore the news.
If anything things like this are always opportunities!
As a final point though, i will say that local Ukrainian and Russian stock markets are more likely to take longer to recover than the worldwide ones.
There are two things to remember.
Firstly, international stocks, if you mean non-US stocks, have always been a good long-term investment.
Any major index linked to the global stock market excluding the United States has done well very long-term.
They just have tended to not do as well as the US stock indexes like the S&P500, Dow Jones and Nasdaq.
However, this leads me to a second point. The performance tends to go in cycles.
Sometimes US stocks beat international and vice versa:
In the 1990s, the US outperformed. From 2000 until 2008, international vastly outperformed, especially emerging markets.
Since then, the US has outperformed. International stocks are due for a rebound, especially because the P/E ratios and CAPE are much cheaper.
If you look at the graph below, the EAFE index (which tracks 21 developed markets excluding the US) looks very cheap:
I wouldn’t get too “cute” and smart though. If it was so easy to beat the US stock market by buying and selling indexes because on looking at ratios, then everybody would do it.
The trick is more to hold a portion in the US, and some in international markets.
The problem is, recency bias means people focus on short-term performance, and only become interested in unfashionable markets once they do well.
This year is a great example. One of the best performing stock markets has been the unfashionable FTSE100 in London, which has regularly been slightly up for the year, despite some stock markets being down 10%.