I often write on Quora.com, where I am the most viewed writer on financial matters, with over 347.7 million views in recent years.
In the answers below I focused on the following topics and issues:
If you want me to answer any questions on Quora or YouTube, or you are looking to invest, don’t hesitate to contact me, email (advice@adamfayed.com) or use the WhatsApp function below.
Source for all answers – Adam Fayed’s Quora page.
One of the best videos I have seen recently was titled: Over 100,000 Brits just lost their whole life savings. Here’s why
For those without the time or inclination, to watch the video, he makes a basic point.
There was a tragedy in the UK called the Grenfell Tower fire:
People were killed. Action was taken to reduce the risk from bad cladding, which was blamed for the disaster.
There is only one issue. Many people live in housing with such cladding, even though most don’t catch fire.
After the new regulations came in to tackle the issue, many people can’t sell their homes unless they spend 30k+ on the improvements.
Let’s see if there is enough uproar to ensure that the government decides to help these landlords and families.
The point is, housing is an illiquid asset, which is heavily regulated to a greater extent than many other investments because of how sensitive it is.
This move is the latest move in the UK, after numerous new taxes were bought in in the last ten years or so.
The government wants people to save for pensions and old age, to reduce the burden on the welfare state, and they have many tax incentives to do so.
Similar tax advantages don’t exist for property, and higher rates of capital gains taxes have been bought in specifically for the asset.
It isn’t just in the UK either. In Japan, and many other locations, governments cracked down on landlords using Airbnb.
Other risks include
Property can be a good investment, for some people, at some times. It can also be cheaper than renting in some locations, especially if you stay long-term.
It isn’t the case that people can’t lose with it though.
That is the assumption. It isn’t always as black and white though. The book below makes some excellent points.
This goes beyond money and more speaks to “advantage”.
Consider some of these points made in the book
The point is, being wealthy is a big advantage compared to being very poor. However, it isn’t always an advantage over being middle-income.
Sometimes an inverted u-curve exists:
A simple example is this. It isn’t easy to read to your kids at night or play sports with them if you are exhausted from poverty and working three jobs.
It also isn’t easy if you are a workaholic who has a lot of money and is in a high-pressed situation.
It is actually easier for somebody who is somewhere in the middle.
This is, even more, the case for the second or third-generation rich. The first generation tends to be motivated as they came from nothing. That isn’t usually the case with those who come after.
Basically, wealth up to a certain point opens up so many doors. It helps with security, personal freedom, your health, freeing up time, giving you more choices, etc.
It usually also helps the first generation a lot, and it is much easier than being in a cycle of poverty which gets more difficult to get out of the longer you are in it.
There is a reason why so many people don’t want their kids to inherit much though.