Countries like Finland, Japan, and Denmark sit at the top of rankings for the highest overall income tax rates.
In Finland, the total tax wedge for high earners can reach 59.9%, depending on municipality, church, and social security. Japan and Denmark aren’t far behind, with effective personal tax rates around 57% and 55.9% respectively.
If you are looking to invest as an expat or high-net-worth individual, you can email me (hello@adamfayed.com) or WhatsApp (+44-7393-450-837).
This includes if you are looking for a free expat portfolio review service to optimize your investments and identify growth prospects.
Some facts might change from the time of writing. Nothing written here is financial, legal, tax, or any kind of individual advice, nor is it a solicitation to invest or a recommendation of any specific product or service.
Understanding where these taxes are heaviest and where they are lowest is essential for high-net-worth individuals, expats, and global entrepreneurs looking to optimize their financial planning.
It is important to note however that a comparison of tax rates a complicated endeavor, making it difficult to reach objective metrics. This is because taxation is often extremely complex and tax burden falls differently on different groups in each country.
This article breaks down which countries levy the highest income taxes, how those taxes are determined, and how those tax burdens affect personal and business decisions.
10 Countries with the Highest Tax Rates 2025
Finland
Finland’s tax system is progressive and consists of both national and municipal taxes. The top marginal rate reaches 59.9%, which includes a national income tax rate of 44.25% and additional municipal and church taxes that vary by location.
Residents are taxed on worldwide income, and tax residency applies after six months of presence.
While the tax burden is high, it funds comprehensive public services such as education, healthcare, and pensions.
For expats, especially high earners, Finland presents a significant tax exposure with few exceptions. For instance, the foreign expert tax regime provides a flat tax rate of 32% on Finnish-source salary income for those foreign employees whose work requires special knowledge.
Japan
Japan levies a national income tax (45%), a local income tax (10%), and a surtax (2.1%), together leading to a top marginal rate of up to 57.1% for tax residents.
Tax residency is determined based on the duration of stay and intent to reside. Foreigners classified as permanent residents are taxed on global income, while non-permanent residents are taxed only on Japanese-sourced income and foreign income remitted to Japan.
Non-residents are subject to a flat 20.42% national income tax with no deductions available, for a total of 32.52% alongside local income tax and surtax. Japan also maintains tax treaties with many countries to mitigate double taxation risks.
Denmark
Denmark’s effective top marginal rate stands at 55.9%, combining national income tax, municipal tax, and labor market contributions.
The country taxes residents on global income and applies some of the highest rates in the OECD.
However, Denmark does offer an expat tax scheme for certain high-income foreign workers and researchers, allowing them to be taxed at a flat rate of 32.84% (combined flat tax and labor market tax) for up to seven years and subject to eligibility conditions.
Outside this regime, resident expats face the same high tax obligations as Danish citizens.
France
For 2025, personal income in France is taxed progressively up to 45%, with additional social charges such as CSG and CRDS pushing the effective rate even higher, especially for high earners, up to 55.4%.
However, France’s unique family quotient system reduces tax burdens for households with dependents.
Despite the steep rates, many residents accept the trade-off in exchange for universal healthcare, strong public infrastructure, and extensive social benefits. France remains a textbook example of a high-tax, high-service economy.
Austria
Austria’s progressive income tax system peaks at 55% for income above €1 million. For most earners, the standard top rate is 50%.
The country taxes residents on their worldwide income and offers few exemptions for expatriates, although some deductions and allowances may apply. Austria’s high social security contributions further increase the effective tax burden.
There is no territorial taxation regime or special expat tax break, making it a high-friction environment for globally mobile professionals.
Sweden
Sweden levies a top marginal tax rate of approximately 52.3%, which includes both state and municipal taxes.
Residents are taxed on worldwide income and subject to additional pension contributions. There are no broad tax exemptions for expatriates, although short-term residents (less than six months) may be taxed only on Swedish-sourced income.
Sweden’s tax regime is transparent and predictable, but offers limited flexibility for international professionals seeking to optimize after-tax income.
Belgium
Belgium’s income tax rates peak at 50%, but the system also includes multiple layers of deductions, surcharges, and social security contributions that raise the effective burden up to 59%.
Belgium taxes residents on global income and applies a particularly complex structure, often requiring expert local guidance.
There is a special expat regime for foreign executives, researchers, and specialists assigned to Belgium, which can reduce taxable income and exempt certain benefits, but it is subject to strict eligibility and reporting conditions.
Israel
Israel taxes residents at progressive rates up to 50%, including a top marginal rate of 47% plus a 3% surtax for high earners.
New immigrants (olim) and returning residents may benefit from a 10-year exemption on foreign-source income and capital gains.
However, expatriates who do not qualify for these programs and remain in Israel beyond 183 days in a year become subject to taxation on worldwide income. Israel has a broad tax treaty network but limited ongoing relief for long-term foreign workers.
Slovenia
Slovenia applies a progressive tax system that tops out at 50%. Residents are taxed on their global income, while non-residents are taxed on income sourced within Slovenia.
The tax system includes social security contributions and limited deductions, with no special tax regime for expatriates.
For foreign professionals relocating to Slovenia, particularly those on long-term contracts, the tax burden can be considerable with minimal room for planning.
Netherlands
The Dutch tax system imposes a top marginal rate of 49.5%, covering income and national insurance contributions.
However, the Netherlands is notable for its 30% ruling, which allows qualifying expatriates to receive 30% of their gross income tax-free for up to five years.
This regime can significantly reduce the effective tax burden for eligible foreign professionals. Without this exemption, expatriates are subject to full resident taxation on worldwide income.
Notable Mention: Ivory Coast
In the past, Ivory Coast imposed one of the highest effective personal income tax rates globally, with top earners subject to a combined marginal rate of approximately 60%.
This is because tax burden was from multiple overlapping levies, including the general income tax (IGR), national contribution tax (CN), and salary tax.
However, as of the Ordonnance No 2023-179 du 13 Septembere 2023, this is no longer the case. The new ITS system adopted a single, progressive tax table.
For personal income derived from salaries and wages, the top marginal tax rate in Ivory Coast is now 32%.
Why are taxes so high in these countries?
The overall tax burden for expats depends on multiple structural factors, not just headline income tax rates. These include:
Personal income tax rates
Most countries with the highest tax rates operate progressive tax systems, where higher income levels are taxed at higher marginal rates.
Expats with professional or investment income are likely to fall into the top tax brackets in these jurisdictions.
How Do Tax Brackets Work?
Tax brackets are tiers that determine how much income tax you pay based on how much you earn. Most countries use a progressive tax system, meaning the more you earn, the higher your marginal tax rate becomes. However, the actual method varies by country.
In a progressive system like those in the United States, Canada, or Germany, income is divided into segments (or brackets), and each segment is taxed at a different rate.
For example, if the first $10,000 is taxed at 10%, and the next $20,000 at 20%, only the amount that falls within each bracket is taxed at that rate—not your entire income.
This is why your effective tax rate (the average rate you actually pay) is lower than your marginal rate (the rate on your last dollar earned).
Some countries use flat tax systems, where all income is taxed at a single rate regardless of how much you earn. These are simpler but less redistributive.
The question of how are tax brackets determined is usually answered by the government’s revenue needs, social spending goals, and political priorities. These are adjusted annually to account for inflation or changes in fiscal policy.
In welfare-heavy states like Sweden or France, higher brackets fund extensive public services. In lower-tax jurisdictions like Singapore, tax brackets are lower and fewer, encouraging private sector growth and investment.
Global vs. territorial taxation
Some countries such as the United States and many European states tax residents on their worldwide income, regardless of where it is earned.
Others, like Singapore or the UAE, follow a territorial model, taxing only income sourced within the country. For expats with international portfolios or remote income, this distinction is critical.
Social security and municipal taxes
In countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Finland, national income taxes are supplemented by municipal or regional taxes.
Additionally, mandatory contributions to pension, unemployment, or healthcare systems can add significantly to the effective rate paid by residents, including expats.
Residency rules and tax treaties
Whether an expat is considered a tax resident often depends on days spent in the country or having a permanent home available.
Tax residency triggers liability on local or worldwide income, depending on jurisdiction. Bilateral tax treaties can reduce or eliminate double taxation, but relief depends on proper structuring and compliance.
Special expat regimes or exemptions
A few countries offer partial relief for foreign workers. For example, the Netherlands provides the 30% ruling, allowing qualifying expats to receive 30% of their income tax-free for up to five years. Absent such regimes, expats are taxed on par with locals.
These variables mean that expatriates must evaluate not only the top marginal tax rate but also the broader fiscal environment, including compliance complexity, enforceability, and availability of planning options.
Countries with high nominal rates may still offer planning routes to mitigate exposure, while others impose burdens without any expat-specific relief.
Is a higher quality of life worth the higher taxes and a high cost of living?
Maybe. The answer depends on what you value and how effective you think a country is at converting your taxes into tangible public benefits.
In the countries above, citizens pay some of the highest income tax rates in the world, but these taxes fund a wide range of services: universal healthcare, subsidized childcare, free university education, well-maintained infrastructure, and strong social safety nets.
For many residents, the return on tax paid is visible, consistent, and contributes to a high standard of living.
Contrast this with countries that also have high tax burdens but offer less in return. In some developing economies, taxpayers may face steep personal or corporate tax rates while still needing to pay privately for health care, education, and even basic infrastructure.
In such cases, the effective cost of living is even higher than it appears, because citizens must duplicate services out-of-pocket that taxes fail to deliver adequately.
There’s also a trade-off between quality of life and economic freedom. Countries with lower taxes such as Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, or Switzerland often offer exceptional public services but place more responsibility on the individual.
These jurisdictions tend to attract entrepreneurs and mobile professionals who prefer to manage their own healthcare, education, and retirement planning in exchange for lower tax interference.
Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal priorities:
- If you value predictability, social equity, and public security, a high-tax, high-service country may feel worth the cost.
- If you prefer flexibility, self-determination, and private solutions, lower-tax environments may be more appealing—even if they come with fewer state-backed guarantees.
The key is to look beyond the headline tax rate and assess whether the total value of public services, ease of doing business, and quality-of-life metrics align with your lifestyle and goals.
A high tax bill may be more tolerable if it’s offset by security, stability, and access to world-class public systems. Conversely, a low tax environment may cost more than it saves if it comes with hidden burdens.
Pained by financial indecision?
Adam is an internationally recognised author on financial matters with over 830million answer views on Quora, a widely sold book on Amazon, and a contributor on Forbes.
