The main difference between an SPV vs JV lies in their structure and purpose within business and investment frameworks.
An SPV is designed to isolate financial risk, while a JV enables multiple parties to collaborate and share control, resources, and profits.
This article covers:
- What is the purpose of a special purpose vehicle vs a joint venture?
- How is an SPV typically structured vs a JV?
- What are the pros and cons of joint ventures?
- How to exit a joint venture agreement vs exiting a specific purpose vehicle?
My contact details are hello@adamfayed.com and WhatsApp +44-7393-450-837 if you have any questions.
The information in this article is for general guidance only. It does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice, and is not a recommendation or solicitation to invest. Some facts may have changed since the time of writing.
What is the difference between JV and SPV?
A joint venture (JV) is a collaborative business arrangement between two or more parties who combine resources to achieve a specific commercial objective.
Each partner typically contributes capital, expertise, or assets and shares in the venture’s profits and losses according to agreed terms.
A special purpose vehicle (SPV), on the other hand, is a separate legal entity created by a parent company for a narrow, predefined purpose often to shield investors from financial risk.
What is the main objective of a joint venture vs a special purpose vehicle?
The main objective of a joint venture is to enable partners to share resources, risks, and expertise to pursue mutual business goals such as entering a new market, developing technology, or completing a major project.
In contrast, the objective of a special purpose vehicle is to ring-fence risk and isolate assets or liabilities from the parent company’s balance sheet.
SPVs are commonly used in project finance, real estate investments, and asset securitizations where financial insulation is crucial.
How to structure a special purpose vehicle vs a joint venture?
SPVs are structured as standalone entities often limited liability companies, trusts, or partnerships, depending on the jurisdiction and project requirements.
Their ownership and control rest primarily with the sponsoring entity, and their activities are restricted to the specific purpose for which they were established.
JVs, meanwhile, can be structured either contractually or as a new joint entity.
Partners decide on equity ownership, profit-sharing arrangements, management roles, and exit terms.
The structure can vary: equity-based, contractual, or cooperative, depending on the scale and jurisdiction of the venture.
Who typically uses SPVs or JVs?
Both SPVs and JVs are widely used by corporations and investors, but their users differ based on strategic goals and financial objectives.
SPVs are typically used by:
- Investment funds and private equity firms for asset holding and securitization
- Real estate developers for project-specific financing
- Multinational corporations to segregate financial risk
JVs are typically used by:
- Companies entering foreign markets with local partners
- Corporations seeking strategic alliances in technology, infrastructure, or energy sectors
- Investors aiming to share project costs and operational risks
For expats and high-net-worth investors, both structures can provide tailored ways to manage global investments efficiently.
What advantage is there to a company if it establishes a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) or joint venture (JV) for a structured finance transaction?
Establishing an SPV or JV for a structured finance transaction can enhance efficiency, risk management, and access to capital.
Advantages of a Special Purpose Vehicle
- Risk isolation: The SPV shields the parent company’s assets from project-specific liabilities.
- Access to financing: SPVs can issue securities backed by project assets, attracting investors without burdening the parent’s balance sheet.
- Tax efficiency: When domiciled in favorable jurisdictions, SPVs can optimize tax outcomes and reduce transaction costs.
- Simplified asset transfer: Assets held in an SPV can be sold or transferred easily without affecting the parent entity.
Advantages of a Joint Venture
- Collaborative expertise: JVs enable companies to combine technical, financial, and operational strengths.
- Shared costs and risks: Each partner contributes resources and absorbs a proportionate share of liabilities.
- Market access: JVs can help foreign companies enter new markets through local partnerships.
- Innovation and scalability: Pooling knowledge and resources accelerates development and project expansion.
Both structures are particularly useful in real estate development, infrastructure finance, and cross-border investments, where effective risk allocation and strategic alignment are crucial.
What are the disadvantages of special purpose vehicles vs joint ventures?
The main disadvantage of an SPV lies in its complexity and limited flexibility, while a JV’s biggest drawback is the potential for partner conflicts and shared control issues.
SPV Disadvantages
- Complex setup and maintenance, especially across multiple jurisdictions
- Regulatory scrutiny, as SPVs are sometimes linked to limited transparency in financial reporting
- Restricted flexibility, since activities are confined to a single defined purpose
JV Disadvantages
- Shared control can result in slower decision-making or management conflicts
- Unequal contributions or unclear governance structures may lead to partner disputes
- Profit-sharing dilution, as returns are divided among participants
What are the exit strategies for JV vs SPV?
JVs usually end through negotiated partner actions, while SPVs conclude once their financial or project objectives are achieved. The specific exit options for each structure include:
For JVs:
- Buyout of one partner’s stake by the other. This occurs when one party wishes to continue the venture independently. The remaining partner purchases the exiting partner’s share based on agreed valuation terms.
- IPO or sale of the jointly owned entity. When the JV grows into a profitable operation, the partners may opt to take it public or sell it to a third party to realize returns.
- Dissolution once the project goals are met. If the JV was created for a finite purpose, such as completing a project, the entity is dissolved once objectives are achieved and profits are distributed.
For SPVs:
- Project completion and asset liquidation. After the SPV fulfills its purpose such as completing a construction or investment project, it sells off assets and distributes proceeds to investors.
- Sale or transfer of the SPV to another investor. The parent company may sell the entire SPV entity to a buyer seeking exposure to the underlying assets, streamlining the transaction process.
- Winding up once the financial purpose is fulfilled. Once the SPV’s obligations are met, it is formally wound up to close accounts and terminate legal existence.
The key distinction is that SPVs are transaction-based and finite, focusing on specific assets or deals, while JVs are relationship-based and strategic, often evolving into long-term partnerships.
Conclusion
Understanding the difference between SPVs and JVs helps investors choose the most effective structure for their financial goals.
- SPVs suit asset protection, risk isolation, and structured finance.
- JVs are ideal for collaboration, resource sharing, and long-term strategic growth.
For international investors and expats managing diverse portfolios, using these structures wisely can optimize tax exposure, reduce liability, and enhance global investment flexibility.
FAQs
What is the difference between an SPV and a VC?
An SPV is a legal entity used to hold specific assets or investments, while a VC (Venture Capital) firm provides funding to early stage companies.
SPVs may be used by VCs to pool investor capital for a single investment.
What are the 4 types of partnership?
The four types of business partnership are general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership (LLP), and limited liability company (LLC) partnership, also known as multi-member LLC.
What is the main difference between a joint venture and a non-joint venture strategic alliance?
A joint venture creates a shared entity or formal agreement with equity participation, while a non-joint venture strategic alliance involves cooperation without creating a new business entity such as marketing or R&D collaborations.
What is the difference between SPE and SPV?
SPE (Special Purpose Entity) is a broad term for any legal entity created for a specific purpose, such as managing assets or financing projects.
An SPV is a type of SPE designed specifically to isolate financial risk and hold assets for a particular transaction. In short, all SPVs are SPEs, but not all SPEs are SPVs.
What is the difference between a joint venture and a limited partnership?
A limited partnership involves general partners who manage the business and limited partners who contribute capital but have no management authority or liability beyond their investment.
A joint venture, on the other hand, is a collaboration where all parties share ownership, control, profits, and active involvement in the project or business operations.
Pained by financial indecision?
Adam is an internationally recognised author on financial matters with over 830million answer views on Quora, a widely sold book on Amazon, and a contributor on Forbes.
