+44 7393 450837
advice@adamfayed.com
Follow on

Is the total amount of money in the world finite? If so, how are people becoming richer?

I often write on Quora.com, where I am the most viewed writer on financial matters, with over 545.6 million views in recent years.

In the answers below I focused on the following topics and issues:

  • Is the total amount of money in the world finite? If so, how are people becoming richer?
  • The more money you have, the easier it is to make. True or false?
  • Why are rich people more frugal than poor ones? Is that statement even true?
  • Why is Switzerland so wealthy?
  • Can the rich emigrate to different countries that have lower taxes?

If you want me to answer any questions on Quora or YouTube, or you are looking to invest, don’t hesitate to contact me, email (advice@adamfayed.com) or use the WhatsApp function below.

Some of the links and videos referred to might only be available on the original answers. 

Source for all answers – Adam Fayed’s Quora page.

Is the total amount of money in the world finite? If so, how are people becoming richer?

Real, inflation-adjusted GDP, didn’t increased much for hundreds of years.

Then the industrial revolution happened and the rest is history:

main qimg 067e255b6a1e3ad469161e85c4434362

So, no, the money in the world isn’t finite.

GDP has been going up for hundreds of years. All that happens is that there is “musical chairs”. Sometimes there is crisis in one region or country, and another region is booming .

The 1990s is a great example. The US and the UK were booming, as were the likes of China, yet in the same decade there was the East Asian Financial Crisis and the Latin American debt crisis.

As per the recent GDP growth, most years the world grows by at least 2%

The average middle-income person these days can live a better life than the richest people could hundreds of years ago and I don’t see it stopping anytime soon now certain countries in Africa, ASEAN and India are growing quickly.

The biggest threat to it is global depopulation.

For the first time in human history we will likely see a declining population this century from something which isn’t starvation-related.

That will probably be the biggest economic challenge after 2050.

The more money you have, the easier it is to make. True or false?

There are two ways to look at this.

With smaller amounts of money, getting a higher ROI is easier.

Let’s say you have $10,000. To double your money in a year, you only need to make $10,000.

There are some deals like that in private markets, albeit with risks. In comparison, if a firm or individual has $100m, getting 15% return is a 15m increase.

You see this with publicly traded stocks as well. Berkshire Hathaway used to easily beat the S&P500.

The advantage has now came to an end for a decent period of time, as per the graph from Seeking Alpha:

main qimg bfbd976c45c5071046266f75980a390b

So, getting a high ROI does become more difficult. That is one reason why many wealthier investors eventually diversify away from their core business and go for “Dragons Den/Shark Tank style” private investments and the stock markets.

Beating the stock markets in business is far easier when you have a small business compared to a large one.

The media say “the rich are getting rich and wealthier”, but the S&P500 has beaten the increase in billionaire wealth since the 1980s.

Or put simply, your wealth would have increased (in percentage terms) more than the average billionaires if you would have invested in the stock markets in the 1980s.

Having said that, the more money and wealth and experience you have:

  • The more opportunities come your way. Interviews, consulting offers etc
  • Even with a lower ROI, your returns will compound if you have millions or billions. For example, the person who gets 10% in a given year from investing in the S&P500, with a starting balance of $100,000, has seen their wealth increase by $10,000. The person who has 10billion and gets 5%, has seen their wealth increase by 500m. This is why the media can be misleading when they say “99% of the wealth created in the last few years has gone to the top 1%”. It is basic maths. Starting with a higher starting balance is more beneficial, even if the ROI is lower
  • The longer you are in business, the more repeat business and referrals you get
  • It is easier to leverage and use other people’s money to make more money. The banks and individuals will trust you more

Saying that, it is normal that wealthy people lose money due to complacency and other issues.

If keeping wealth was so easy, there wouldn’t be the need for advisors, lawyers, trusts etc.

Why are rich people more frugal than poor ones?

Let me give you an analogy:

The juicer:

main qimg 4390a7e4f1221a528c5e9d39e4d15220 lq

The waterfall:

main qimg 11c2c573f3255f072abcb6ced5e1f44d lq

Let’s deal with the first one.

Premier League football clubs have got ‘richer’ in terms of revenue, but not profits.

The reason is simple. More money comes in, but more goes out in terms of player wages and transfer fees (including money paid to agents).

Many of the players are the same. It is estimated that 70% of former professional athletes go broke within 5–10 years of retirement.

So, they got ‘rich’, but it wasn’t sustainable. They didn’t stay wealthy.

This is because as more money comes in, an equally high amount often goes out.

Fresh money has to be earned to ensure the system works. If income ever stops, they become broke.

In comparison, many self-made businesspeople get wealthy by following a simple formula:

  • Be very frugal to begin with. Every penny saved can be put into the business
  • Then once the dividends you take from the business are consistently good, or you sell out, you have enough money to ensure a steady stream of income from those assets. At this point you don’t need to be frugal because there are always fresh ‘streams’ of income coming in.

So, the majority of self-made wealthier people are at least very frugal for a period of time.

It isn’t unusual to find a 27-year-old founder living like a student.

In comparison, if you have a job, the incentives to be frugal might be lower.

What is true is that studies show that wealthier people are more likely to spend on education, travel, health and experiences.

In comparison, some consumer luxury goods are more likely to be owned by people who aren’t earning much.

You even see it with cars. In the UK and some other countries, it is common to see people using credit to buy fancy cars on average incomes.

Even Rolex watches are more likely to be owned by middle earners than high earners in many countries.

Why is Switzerland so wealthy?

main qimg f06c7e3cf00afc28be346b64de3cb57a pjlq

This is Kim Jong Un in Switzerland.

Why was Switzerland chosen to educate the future leader? It is politically neutral.

Therefore, people could invest into Swiss wealth management firms and banks from all around the world.

So Swiss firms had clients from the Soviet Union during the Cold War. They also had American and European clients.

By “playing both sides”, without annoying anybody, they could take money from each block.

We are seeing similar things now. Where is the growth these days?

ASEAN in South East Asia:

main qimg 4dad75ac8000fd382f57fe09ae95d8f4

India:

main qimg 64367299152d0d66db95d952e7d66fe1 lq

Dubai and other parts of the UAE, alongside the wealthier parts of the Middle East such as Qatar:

main qimg c0a8d1391cee7c2fefe66cb7cbd3a0b2 lq

That isn’t to mention some African economies as well.

What do they all have in common? They might not be completely neutral, but they are open to money from around the world.

Wealthy Russians are moving to Dubai. They aren’t so welcome in London or Berlin even if they have no political connections, and especially if they are seeking a new visa.

Many Chinese firms are still investing in Vietnam even though it is obvious that they are closer to the Americans than to China.

So, going back to Switzerland, the neutrality element is one of the keys. It helped increase some of the positives other writers mentioned below, such as political stability.

Can the rich emigrate to different countries that have lower taxes?

It is an interesting question considering the present political moves which have seen governments as far and wide as Mexico, Brazil, Columbia, Peru and Western countries suggest more taxes on “the rich”.

To answer your question, it isn’t just possible, it has been happening for decades.

What is more, it isn’t just high-income and wealthy people who do it.

Have you ever been to Saudi Arabia, Monaco, the UAE and many other low-tax countries?

What do you notice?

The teachers at the international schools are mostly non-natives.

The taxi and uber drivers are from overseas.

main qimg 0a58751fbfdd1fb024d59741a9da3353 lq

The middle managers and senior executives hanging out at the airport business class lounge or trendy bars are often from all around the world.

The nurses and doctors that are treating you is from a foreign country. It isn’t just nurses from poorer countries either. There are many British nurses who go for a few years, to take advantage of higher salaries and zero direct taxes.

And yes, many of the higher-end business owners also come from all around the world.

What changes is who moves.

In the early-mid 2000s, plenty of Venezuelans moved.

After France’s 75% higher rate tax was announced, plenty of French people moved to lower tax countries, before it was abolished.

In more recent times, the streets of a place like Dubai are full of middle-income and wealthy Russians, Iranians and other places where there is either political instability or radical tax proposals.

I wouldn’t therefore be surprised to see more people emigrating from numerous high-tax Western countries, and also Latin America due to policies like this.

This is barely a few years after Argentina did something similar.

Having said that, moving overseas isn’t always as simple as buying a ticket.

You need to work out:

– How to structure your business

– How to structure your personal finances

– Schools, hospitals etc

Moving overseas for tax alone isn’t as effective as what I would call a “Tax plus” approach.

If you can move to a low-tax, but super-efficient place with great services, you will likely be happier than moving to a random low-tax country.

Pained by financial indecision? Want to invest with Adam?

smile beige jacket 4 1024x604 2

Adam is an internationally recognised author on financial matters with over 830million answer views on Quora, a widely sold book on Amazon, and a contributor on Forbes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This URL is merely a website and not a regulated entity, so shouldn’t be considered as directly related to any companies (including regulated ones) that Adam Fayed might be a part of.

This Website is not directed at and should not be accessed by any person in any jurisdiction – including the United States of America, the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates and the Hong Kong SAR – where (by reason of that person’s nationality, residence or otherwise) the publication or availability of this Website and/or its contents, materials and information available on or through this Website (together, the “Materials“) is prohibited.

Adam Fayed makes no representation that the contents of this Website is appropriate for use in all locations, or that the products or services discussed on this Website are available or appropriate for sale or use in all jurisdictions or countries, or by all types of investors. It is your responsibility to be aware of and to observe all applicable laws and regulations of any relevant jurisdiction.

The Website and the Material are intended to provide information solely to professional and sophisticated investors who are familiar with and capable of evaluating the merits and risks associated with financial products and services of the kind described herein and no other persons should access, act on it or rely on it. Nothing on this Website is intended to constitute (i) investment advice or any form of solicitation or recommendation or an offer, or solicitation of an offer, to purchase or sell any financial product or service, (ii) investment, legal, business or tax advice or an offer to provide any such advice, or (iii) a basis for making any investment decision. The Materials are provided for information purposes only and do not take into account any user’s individual circumstances.

The services described on the Website are intended solely for clients who have approached Adam Fayed on their own initiative and not as a result of any direct or indirect marketing or solicitation. Any engagement with clients is undertaken strictly on a reverse solicitation basis, meaning that the client initiated contact with Adam Fayed without any prior solicitation.

*Many of these assets are being managed by entities where Adam Fayed has personal shareholdings but whereby he is not providing personal advice.

This website is maintained for personal branding purposes and is intended solely to share the personal views, experiences, as well as personal and professional journey of Adam Fayed.

Personal Capacity
All views, opinions, statements, insights, or declarations expressed on this website are made by Adam Fayed in a strictly personal capacity. They do not represent, reflect, or imply any official position, opinion, or endorsement of any organization, employer, client, or institution with which Adam Fayed is or has been affiliated. Nothing on this website should be construed as being made on behalf of, or with the authorization of, any such entity.

Endorsements, Affiliations or Service Offerings
Certain pages of this website may contain general information that could assist you in determining whether you might be eligible to engage the professional services of Adam Fayed or of any entity in which Adam Fayed is employed, holds a position (including as director, officer, employee or consultant), has a shareholding or financial interest, or with which Adam Fayed is otherwise professionally affiliated. However, any such services—whether offered by Adam Fayed in a professional capacity or by any affiliated entity—will be provided entirely separately from this website and will be subject to distinct terms, conditions, and formal engagement processes. Nothing on this website constitutes an offer to provide professional services, nor should it be interpreted as forming a client relationship of any kind. Any reference to third parties, services, or products does not imply endorsement or partnership unless explicitly stated.

*Many of these assets are being managed by entities where Adam Fayed has personal shareholdings but whereby he is not providing personal advice.

I confirm that I don’t currently reside in the United States, Puerto Rico, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Cuba or any heavily-sanctioned countries.

If you live in the UK, please confirm that you meet one of the following conditions:

1. High-net-worth

I make this statement so that I can receive promotional communications which are exempt

from the restriction on promotion of non-readily realisable securities.

The exemption relates to certified high net worth investors and I declare that I qualify as such because at least one of the following applies to me:

I had, throughout the financial year immediately preceding the date below, an annual income

to the value of £100,000 or more. Annual income for these purposes does not include money

withdrawn from my pension savings (except where the withdrawals are used directly for

income in retirement).

I held, throughout the financial year immediately preceding the date below, net assets to the

value of £250,000 or more. Net assets for these purposes do not include the property which is my primary residence or any money raised through a loan secured on that property. Or any rights of mine under a qualifying contract or insurance within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) order 2001;

  1. c) or Any benefits (in the form of pensions or otherwise) which are payable on the

termination of my service or on my death or retirement and to which I am (or my

dependents are), or may be entitled.

2. Self certified investor

I declare that I am a self-certified sophisticated investor for the purposes of the

restriction on promotion of non-readily realisable securities. I understand that this

means:

i. I can receive promotional communications made by a person who is authorised by

the Financial Conduct Authority which relate to investment activity in non-readily

realisable securities;

ii. The investments to which the promotions will relate may expose me to a significant

risk of losing all of the property invested.

I am a self-certified sophisticated investor because at least one of the following applies:

a. I am a member of a network or syndicate of business angels and have been so for

at least the last six months prior to the date below;

b. I have made more than one investment in an unlisted company in the two years

prior to the date below;

c. I am working, or have worked in the two years prior to the date below, in a

professional capacity in the private equity sector, or in the provision of finance for

small and medium enterprises;

d. I am currently, or have been in the two years prior to the date below, a director of a company with an annual turnover of at least £1 million.

 

Adam Fayed is not UK based nor FCA-regulated.

 

Adam Fayed uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience, deliver personalized content based on your preferences, and help us better understand how our website is used. By continuing to browse adamfayed.com, you consent to our use of cookies.


Learn more in our Privacy Policy & Terms & Conditions.