Why did FTX collapse? What does FTX’s collapse reveal about cryptocurrencies?

I often write on Quora.com, where I am the most viewed writer on financial matters, with over 504.5 million views in recent years.

In the answers below I focused on the following topics and issues:

• Why did FTX collapse? What does FTX’s collapse reveal about cryptocurrencies?
• How rich is 500k a year and what lifestyle it buys?
• How would you prove money is more important than time? I explain why, unlike the question’s premise, time is more important than money
• Why are some investors turning to alternative assets?
• Is it possible to have a work/life balance as an entrepreneur at the early stages of your startup?

If you want me to answer any questions on Quora or YouTube, or you are looking to invest, don’t hesitate to contact me, email (advice@adamfayed.com) or use the WhatsApp function below.

Some of the links and videos referred to might only be available on the original answers. 

Source for all answers – Adam Fayed’s Quora page.

Why did FTX collapse? What does FTX’s collapse reveal about cryptocurrencies?

I won’t say much about why it collapsed, as much has been written below and in the media.

Many people are now speculating whether the founder, the person pictured above, was engaged in widespread fraud or was just incompetent.

Let’s look at what the collapse reveals.

The main thing are:

1. Most people don’t understand the risks associated with cryptocurrencies. This makes it easier for bad actors to take advantage of the system
2. There is a lot of leverage and interdependency in the system. So, one exchange going down can affect the whole system.
3. Many people bought these coins in 2020 and 2021, due to stimulus money and speculation. The next few years will be the biggest test yet for the whole ecosystem because you have higher interest rates, a possible recession, more regulation etc. Unlike stock markets which have a 100-200 year track record of hitting new highs and pay dividends, cryptocurrencies have been small until recently.
4. Advocates of these kinds of investments or speculations will say people shouldn’t hold them on exchanges, and instead cold storage. These cold storage facilities protect them from hackers and people like the founder of FTX (assuming he did something wrong and he should be innocent until proven guilty).

I don’t think it reveals that deregulated options are always bad, however.

Madoff was in a regulated market. The big banks always pay fines every year. Google HSBC fines 2022, 2021, 2020 and go back as long as you want.

They have worked out that paying fines but not changing their processes is often cheaper than changing their processes and paying no fines!

I was speaking to a client in South East Asia a few months ago. He deals with market entry and he said “I hate banks and governments”, and went on to explain it is due to the hypocrisy he has seen in his legal career.

He has witnessed many banks who will flag a $15,000 payment and they will say it is due to the $10,000 SWIFT threshold being breached, but they often won’t flag a $10m payment, for self-interested reasons.

Likewise, cash is regulated, but the $100 bill is used extensively by criminals and others.

So, even though I am a crypto sceptic, I do feel many people have missed the point here.

The only caveat to that is that almost all stock and bond brokerages use third-party custody banks such as BNY Mellon to hold securities, which means even if smaller brokerages go under, investors are usually safe.

Many traditional brokerages also use a segregated accounts system which in human terms means clients assets are held off balance sheet, thereby negating the need for government guarantees.

FTX seemed to be acting more like a bank rather than an exchange, in that they were holding the assets directly, and therefore could access them directly.

The point is, the devil is in the detail. Just saying “lack of regulation caused this” is overly simplistic.

How rich is 500k a year and what lifestyle it buys?

It depends on where you live, and the cost of living (including taxes).

$500,000 will become $250,000 after tax in some places. It will stay at $500,000 in some locations like the UAE, Monaco, Cayman etc, assuming you aren’t an American who hasn’t renounced citizenship.

In a low-tax and low-cost place like Bulgaria or Georgia, you could live like a king on 500k and save and invest loads of money on the side.

In comparison, you could easily spend $500,000 in Hawaii, LA, New York or London if you aren’t careful.

Here is what a $3,000 a month house buys you in some parts of Bulgaria, Georgia in the caucasus and many other places.

And here is what $3,000 buys you in New York

The point is, it is easy to be “rich” and not wealth and secure.

Those who become wealthy from normal backgrounds, eventually work out some basic facts such as:

1. It is better to focus on what your money can earn you, and not buy you. If you do that, eventually you will be able to buy more anyway.
2. Spending money on fun experiences and things which tend to go up in price over time, is better than most consumer goods. If you buy a holiday home, for example, it might not be the best investment in the world. But if it at least matches inflation and gives you a rental yield during the month when you aren’t in town, it can make sense if you are also buying it for lifestyle.
3. It is best to try to not impress random people, who you don’t even like, as per the quote below

This is one reason digital nomad visas are becoming so popular.

It is geo-arbitrage.

How would you prove money is more important than time?

This is Charlie Munger.

He is 99, and Warren Buffet’s business partner.

He lost one of his eyes in an operation a few decades ago.

Would you prefer to be him, or 21 again?

I know what most people would say.

That is one reason why even frugal wealthy people are willing to pay money to save time.

So, no, I can’t prove that money is more important than time.

Money can buy you other people’s time and more options though.

Is it possible to have a work/life balance as an entrepreneur at the early stages of your startup?

Consider these basic truths:

1. Everybody wants to make money in business, whatever they say in public. It is true that many business owners are driven by something other than money. The freedom to make your own schedule, changing things in your industry and many other things, but money is one part of it
2. Therefore, if it was easy to start a business from nothing in an easier way, everybody would do it.
3. If you work double as hard as other people, you will gain twice as much experience. So, just as learning a language isn’t just about age but also practice, the same is true in business.
4. If you start succeeding, others will try to copy, so you might have to work harder, or do something else, to add a moat around your business.

So, it is extremely difficult to have a work-life at the early stages of a start-up. Most have work-life integration at best.

By that I mean you are likely thinking about business even in social situations, and might use social situations to network.

The only exceptions to this are:

• If you start a lifestyle business. For example, you start a consultancy after having experience in the field, and only want to work part-time later in life. Isn’t really a start up, but it is still starting your own business
• You inherit a lot of money, or use other people’s money. Usually, getting financed takes a lot of work, but sometimes money is given out too liberally
• You are just continuing what you started working for somebody else. Let’s say you are an accountant and then start your own practice, and many of your clients follow you.

That doesn’t mean everybody starting a new venture needs to work 18 hours a day.

It makes sense to work as many hours as is productive, and also work smart.

Once you have established yourself, outsourcing and delegating makes sense because you can’t scale how many hours you work beyond 20 hours a day at most, and anybody can copy hard work in isolation, so the whole business shouldn’t be only about having a great work ethic.

Nevertheless, it is better if you know how to do a lot of these jobs yourself first, before outsourcing and automating.

It is harder to know how to delegate if you don’t know about the tasks to begin with. We have all met those managers or leaders in their ivory towers who are out of touch with reality.

What is more, if you can grow a business organically first through grit and hard work, it is more likely you can take it to the next level with extra financing, people, resources etc.

In comparison, those founders who depended on using other people’s money in technology and other industries in the 1990s and more recently, often struggle during harder times.

Why are some investors turning to alternative assets?

There have always been investors who seek alternative assets.

The main reasons have always been:

• Portfolio diversification
• Having non-correlated assets. In other words, assets that can rise when markets fall and vice versa
• In the case of private equity, a chance to make huge returns if it goes well, albeit with high risk.
• Sometimes enhanced income and downside-protection.

Since 2008 and negative real interest rates, the incentives have grown bigger

As people are losing money in the bank relative to inflation, there is clearly an incentive to take bigger risks.

Added to that, you now have the democratisation of alternative asset.

Look at all the peer-to-peer, art and other alternative assets which are now available to everybody through companies like Lendermarket

The majority of average retail investors, who don’t have an advisor, should be careful with alternative assets.

They are often illiquid and carry bigger risks than buying more vanilla assets.

Many of those risks are more hidden than traditional assets as well.

Pained by financial indecision? Want to invest with Adam?

Adam is an internationally recognised author on financial matters with over 830million answer views on Quora, a widely sold book on Amazon, and a contributor on Forbes.